Concepts‎ > ‎

Facts arguing

posted Feb 2, 2012, 6:57 AM by Maxymets Serhiy   [ updated Feb 2, 2012, 10:06 AM ]
Status: live at Prototype 3

There is no ability to argue your vision without affecting someone mind. This harms opinion independance and diversity, and this is critical for Basic decision-making.

The only way to influence the result (except submitting nice decisions) is to expose some not well known facts to the judging public. Facts use scheme similar to decisions:

Facts arguing scheme

Here is a scenario (that steps are executed simultaneously with Basic decision-making steps):
  1. Everyone have the ability to submit a fact to Decision Pool
  2. False, bad and duplicate facts are processed via  Unmoderated self-organization
  3. Every fact is rated as important one by some % of participants.
  4. Top-rated facts form the Important facts group (up to 5 positions  usually).
  5. Important facts are shown to every participant before any judgements around current task.
Comments