Status: live at Prototype 3
This concept is not big novelty, but it contains some modifications for high-load. This scheme performs well even with millions of
participants and thousands of decision variants. The main principle: participant should not see any voting results up to his final vote in order to stay independent-minded. According to The Wisdom of Crowds researches, the quality of final decision depends on opinions independence and diversity.
Here is a scenario (take a note, that steps are executed simultaneously): - Everyone have the ability to submit his decision variant to Decision Pool.
- Bad and duplicate decisions are processed via Unmoderated self-organization.
- Every decision is rated as probable one by some % of participants.
- High-rated decisions form the Decision Top (up to 5 positions
usually).
- Participants perform final vote at Decision Top (shown in random order).
- If the decision with big advantage is detected, it is marked as Taken Decision.
- Process continues, while Taken Decision appears.
Sure, this contept is not perfect one and there are a lot of questions to it. But it's good starting point. By the way it can be considered as consensus friendly decision-making, especially being combined with other TRYNE concepts. | 
